INFORMATION EXPERT ON DUTY Fabio Fazio: What's really risk of cancer as compared to energy plants ? Umberto Veronesi: Zero. Zero ... All the surveys we've done, books and books, have not led to any evidence of increased cancer in populations surrounding the incinerators. This therefore is a fact. We talk about the latest generation of incinerators. They are very safe, very efficient, and therefore I see no danger. The slight amount of dioxin coming out is less than that which comes out in the gas-fired power plants ... Comment by Veronesi Stefano Montanari on ... Montanari: is formidable businessman, is an incredible businessman. So it is very good, that it can do its job well ... Science has never known anything, does not understand anything, that is not his job, but it is an exceptional businessman, and a very good businessman. Interviewer: Just nobody but the next day you stand up and say: no one has said expelled? Montanari: None? Acident! L ' ISDE (International Society of Doctors for the Environment ) wrote that what he said is meaningless scintifico Veronesi. It has no scientific validity ... It is an international organization for all physicians throughout the world. The Federation of French doctors, the doctor's orders Emilia Romagna ... [...] It is clear that on television who is interested in going ... that is, television today is all television system, all. But because of television system? Because who does the publicity it's not Stefano Montanari. Who makes the advertising is ENI, ENEL ... Take Veronesi. Go to the site Veronesi 1 ... Look who pays ... but he writes it. He is paid for example [......] which is a French company that builds incinerators. Mica he can say incinerators suck. Is paid. There is a multi-utility , I can not remember the name, Acerra ... Those are the incineration of waste. Veronesi And how to say this stuff causes cancer. Exaggerated, because when one says zero covers also ridiculous, but that care, I say, ridiculous. No one notices. Interviewer: But this veneer of credibility prevents people suspected of suspicious, no? ... Montanari: But, in short, he is a character that was built ... court is the scientist, the scientist's regime. They put it there, have made people believe that all this meant, and that's it. People believe. facilitation POLITICAL Fine dust and incinerators(deleted version of Wikipedia)In line with other researchers, Stefano Montanari considers the fine dust created man-made pollution a major cause in nanopatologie focusing especially on the pollution from incinerators , considering not only unnecessary, extremely harmful and that it's based on no real scientific justification. According to Montanari, new generation ones, are falsely classified as incinerators, but does not really enhance anything. Quite the contrary. The only way to develop a waste is its reuse and recycling. Their construction and their use in any case, at least when it concerns Italy, is motivated by vested interests, political, economic, and often by ecomafie . This important and disturbing aspect about the devastation of the environment, the result of quarrels and intrigues perpetrated by the various administrations local scattered throughout the country, became increasingly evident during his experience around Italy, lecturing, and especially during the grueling tour along with comedian Beppe Grillo. "The Pool of fine" is a sort of diary of his long experience of this indefatigable disclosure. According Montanari, burn tons of waste in which you can find anything (the entire periodic table of elements ) is something extremely pointless and devoid of any scientific validity, because they are formed so unexpected compounds, dangerous, such as dioxins (hundreds of types), a quantity myriad of micro-and nanoparticles , not to mention that the ash ends up in landfill anyway, and what is worse is often placed in bricks and other building materials . The filters of the incinerators, said Montanari, serves only to hold the primary filterable powder (very little), while the primary dust condensation forms over, bypass, no question not even the secondary powders that are formed even at great distance from the incinerator . The unscientific and harmful effects of incinerators, according Montanari, is also backed by a law of chemistry, discovered by Antoine Lavoisier , summarized in the motto "nothing is created and nothing is destroyed, but everything changes. "Thus, burning one ton of waste, they do not disappear but are found in the form of other substances, the most dangerous, if the initial amount of waste it was. In addition, the mass of the waste is treated with large amounts of water, ammonia , lime , bicarbonate, which doubles the mass. the dangers of the dust is inversely proportional to their size and also depends on their chemical composition . Particulates eg. from traffic or cement (unless you burn waste) is fairly uniform and predictable, while the produced by incinerators is extremely heterogeneous and impossible to predict accurately. Substances that form nanoparticles produced by incinerators are the most diverse and, given their pervasive nature, within a few seconds manage to cross the respiratory tract, lungs, blood, and end up in the tissues, liver, brain. As for metals and metal compounds such as asbestos , iron, titanium, etc.., Being recognized as foreign bodies, end up forming a tissue inflammation ( granulomatosis) that can sometimes turn into cancer. The nanopatologie also include heart disease and tract. Links
|
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Lotion Cervical Mucus Before Period
equation (in) credibility. De Luca Veronesi + 0 + 0 = 0 =
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment