| videos, pictures and text were taken from the blog of Italy of Values \u200b\u200b http://italiadeivalori.antoniodipietro.com/ ... - article by Maurizio Zipponi Author 's statement Brunetta, minister of the former Socialist government Berlusconi calling to abolish Article 1 of our Constitution, transforming it from a Republic founded on work based on the arbitrary rule of the powerful Republic are located in this bill to the full work and practical application.  Maurizio Zipponi the E 'false are liars and those who say that the worker is free to choose between the referee and the judge will be asked in the recruitment, generally precarious or temporary, whether the employee intends to use shared an arbitrator from or a "dangerous" court. I wonder and wonder who ever in these conditions is free to choose? The liberal principles on which our Constitution also provide that the function of the law and those who must apply, the court needed to balance the unequal power between weak and strong. In this case we simply return to the Middle Ages , who is weak can not appeal to the State to enforce their rights. Carry a letter from a worker, Marco Bazzoni, representative of workers in a company of Florence. Text of the letter There go again, after the Berlusconi government in 2002 we had already tried to delete Article 18 of the Workers' Statute (Law 300 of May 20, 1970), but we were not successful, but only thanks to the strong opposition of the CGIL (I was there I also at the Circus Maximus, where the CGIL organized the largest demonstration in defense of Article 18 of the Workers' Statute, taking to the streets 3 million people), now we try again with the working draft bill introducing the arbitration in labor disputes . The only union that is making strong opposition against the circumvention of Article 18 (as it did in 2002) is the CGIL. CISL and UIL are watching, not doing any barricade. Angeletti said: For Uil an arbitration as an alternative to court for the resolution of employment relationship is "a reasonable alternative." While Bonanni said: "The employee can safely continue to go to the Labour Court as it always has. " The status of workers has not been touched and 18 is there. " And how could they do otherwise, when in 2002 (very few who remember it), CISL and UIL signed with the former Berlusconi government the "Pact for Italy", which has stayed Article 18 for three years (see article ). The Labour Bill was finally approved by the Senate by 151 votes in favor, 83 against and 5 abstentions. A "referee" in place of the court: the Article 31 of the Bill provides for the job. Under Article 31 changing modes of settling labor disputes, and now instead of the court may intervene a new figure, the referee. Article 18 provides that the court restores the worker who has been dismissed without just cause. With the new norm - instead - it will be the employee to decide whom to trust, if the court (as before), or the referee. In this way, the article 18 becomes an option! It is clear to anyone that Article 31 of the bill is unconstitutional, only one person has not yet understood, ie Labour Minister Maurizio Sacconi, so that in a press agency Adnkronos, Sacconi said: Pd CGIL and let them use, "I fear not for nothing that the unconstitutionality of the provision on arbitration for layoffs." is on Facebook was opened yesterday by a group called "Hands down in Article 18" ( join group) yesterday, in a few hours had collected 3,000 signatures. Today, the membership increased to 10,792. I invite all to join. Marco Bazzoni, metalworker and representatives of workers' safety.
Video and text were taken from the blog 's Italy of Values \u200b\u200b http://italiadeivalori.antoniodipietro.com/ ... - article by Maurizio Zipponi | ||||||
0 comments:
Post a Comment