Stefano Tieri
Process Mills : Mr. B will not be condemned because
Background: I started collecting material for the article about a month ago, when speaking of the various "plans" with which Silvio Berlusconi could avoid his processes was a taboo. So far, the defense is the hottest of all the newspapers treat and even the news can not help but open his eyes. Sure, there are different ways of talking about it, and showing everything as simple government practice (as if Parliament and the Senate should apply to dictate the agenda and processes to the premier-defendant) they end up looking like the latest chapter in the history of a war - between politics and the judiciary - which began in 1992 with clean hands. But let's get the facts ...
Following confirmation of the sentence in the appellate ruling, pending the final verdict of the Supreme Court (provided by April 2010), the whole of Italy - or at least the part that still has the courage to read a newspaper in the morning - asked about the future legal lawyer David Mills and his distinguished co-defendant, the Prime Minister.
will be condemned? Acquitted? Simple question: the crime will be required. A term for the prime minister and his Stalinist system of information amounts to "fulfilled" (Open Studio in the news this anticipated even Berlusconi himself, said even the mouth of Luigi Galluzzo, formerly May 19, 2009: 'the day they leave the grounds of the Mills trial in which Berlusconi was acquitted ... ").
And now here are the (many) causes that lead to an inevitable requirement.
First of all, the Lodo Alfano. Although the Court has deemed unconstitutional, this does not exclude its decisive influence on the trial of Mr. B, the three judges who sentenced David Mills as a witness in the interests of corrupt Berlusconi - that Gandus, Dorigo and Caccialanza - having just expressed a similar opinion regarding the same alleged facts to the premier in the key-corrupt corrupter, have become the law 'incompatible' to judge the prime minister himself. The process, with the three new judges elected, not restart from where you left it: the defense, in fact, has the right to require that all the evidence, executing requests abroad and the evidence gathered in almost two years to process (by the old judges) to be collected again (the new judges). Unlike the process, however, the time limitation (although it had been "frozen" by the award) are not cleared. If 2 +2 4, it is easy to imagine how the prescription, whose time within which half was triggered by the ex Cirielli Law (Law No. 251 of December 5, 2005, approved during the third Berlusconi government), will be a very easy target.
But there's more. Because the current state of things in If you come to a final conviction for Mills, the hearing in the trial of Mr Berlusconi would not be very long: the court would only have to prove whether or not the prime minister gave the order to pay the co-defendant, and all end up there (as the offense, or the bribe paid by Fininvest to Mills, is already proven).
There is a risk, in short, that even with the law Cirielli and explained the mechanism was triggered by the ruling, it reaches a verdict for Mr. B. And then the lawyers come into play in the premier and members of the PDL in the ranks, creating a rule that would deny the value judgments of the trial, contained within the reform of the penal code.
This probably would be enough, but it's better to be safe in the last days of the prime minister's lawyers have been indulged to find several new solutions, where some of them are rejected by the majority (of several men was An have often been shown not to appreciate some of the rules on a personal basis). Ghedini thus designed to further cut the time limitation (for the accuracy of a quarter, relating to crimes with a penalty of less than 10 years and have been committed before May 2, 2006: should perhaps point out that in the category also includes the process for Berlusconi's corruption?) meeting, however, the hostility of Finian, worried perhaps from the negative effects that such a rule would lead to the judicial system.
Alfano, after consulting with Longo and Ghedini, is another possible solution, revealed by Dino Martano Corriere della Sera on 29 October set a ceiling of three years for the first instance, two for 'appeal, one for the Supreme Court. the reporter concludes: "with the first or the second solution, the dropping of the process Berlusconi Mills had already prescribed.
The way forward to save the Prime Minister has finally found it, they will agree Berlusconi and Fini: put a limit of two years for every court (Which makes the final determination applies equally Marta) where the accused has no criminal record. Maliciously might note that the Prime Minister, thanks to six prescriptions (not counting the various processes by which escaped unhurt thanks to many rules on a personal basis) and a incesurato, and enjoy this additional cut so the statute of limitations: it blasting, in addition to the Mills case, the funds for blacks Mediaset.
"It would be absurd and illogical - reveals Mills talking about the process that sees him joined Berlusconi - if one were convicted and one acquitted: either both guilty or innocent, given the nature of the accusation of corruption. " Conviction or acquittal? Apparently, while British lawyer will touch (if the sentence is confirmed to the Supreme Court) the first lot, the second - more successful - will be acquitted. In the dictionary
Berlusconi, of course.
Process Mills : Mr. B will not be condemned because
Background: I started collecting material for the article about a month ago, when speaking of the various "plans" with which Silvio Berlusconi could avoid his processes was a taboo. So far, the defense is the hottest of all the newspapers treat and even the news can not help but open his eyes. Sure, there are different ways of talking about it, and showing everything as simple government practice (as if Parliament and the Senate should apply to dictate the agenda and processes to the premier-defendant) they end up looking like the latest chapter in the history of a war - between politics and the judiciary - which began in 1992 with clean hands. But let's get the facts ...
Following confirmation of the sentence in the appellate ruling, pending the final verdict of the Supreme Court (provided by April 2010), the whole of Italy - or at least the part that still has the courage to read a newspaper in the morning - asked about the future legal lawyer David Mills and his distinguished co-defendant, the Prime Minister.
will be condemned? Acquitted? Simple question: the crime will be required. A term for the prime minister and his Stalinist system of information amounts to "fulfilled" (Open Studio in the news this anticipated even Berlusconi himself, said even the mouth of Luigi Galluzzo, formerly May 19, 2009: 'the day they leave the grounds of the Mills trial in which Berlusconi was acquitted ... ").
And now here are the (many) causes that lead to an inevitable requirement.
First of all, the Lodo Alfano. Although the Court has deemed unconstitutional, this does not exclude its decisive influence on the trial of Mr. B, the three judges who sentenced David Mills as a witness in the interests of corrupt Berlusconi - that Gandus, Dorigo and Caccialanza - having just expressed a similar opinion regarding the same alleged facts to the premier in the key-corrupt corrupter, have become the law 'incompatible' to judge the prime minister himself. The process, with the three new judges elected, not restart from where you left it: the defense, in fact, has the right to require that all the evidence, executing requests abroad and the evidence gathered in almost two years to process (by the old judges) to be collected again (the new judges). Unlike the process, however, the time limitation (although it had been "frozen" by the award) are not cleared. If 2 +2 4, it is easy to imagine how the prescription, whose time within which half was triggered by the ex Cirielli Law (Law No. 251 of December 5, 2005, approved during the third Berlusconi government), will be a very easy target.
But there's more. Because the current state of things in If you come to a final conviction for Mills, the hearing in the trial of Mr Berlusconi would not be very long: the court would only have to prove whether or not the prime minister gave the order to pay the co-defendant, and all end up there (as the offense, or the bribe paid by Fininvest to Mills, is already proven).
There is a risk, in short, that even with the law Cirielli and explained the mechanism was triggered by the ruling, it reaches a verdict for Mr. B. And then the lawyers come into play in the premier and members of the PDL in the ranks, creating a rule that would deny the value judgments of the trial, contained within the reform of the penal code.
This probably would be enough, but it's better to be safe in the last days of the prime minister's lawyers have been indulged to find several new solutions, where some of them are rejected by the majority (of several men was An have often been shown not to appreciate some of the rules on a personal basis). Ghedini thus designed to further cut the time limitation (for the accuracy of a quarter, relating to crimes with a penalty of less than 10 years and have been committed before May 2, 2006: should perhaps point out that in the category also includes the process for Berlusconi's corruption?) meeting, however, the hostility of Finian, worried perhaps from the negative effects that such a rule would lead to the judicial system.
Alfano, after consulting with Longo and Ghedini, is another possible solution, revealed by Dino Martano Corriere della Sera on 29 October set a ceiling of three years for the first instance, two for 'appeal, one for the Supreme Court. the reporter concludes: "with the first or the second solution, the dropping of the process Berlusconi Mills had already prescribed.
The way forward to save the Prime Minister has finally found it, they will agree Berlusconi and Fini: put a limit of two years for every court (Which makes the final determination applies equally Marta) where the accused has no criminal record. Maliciously might note that the Prime Minister, thanks to six prescriptions (not counting the various processes by which escaped unhurt thanks to many rules on a personal basis) and a incesurato, and enjoy this additional cut so the statute of limitations: it blasting, in addition to the Mills case, the funds for blacks Mediaset.
"It would be absurd and illogical - reveals Mills talking about the process that sees him joined Berlusconi - if one were convicted and one acquitted: either both guilty or innocent, given the nature of the accusation of corruption. " Conviction or acquittal? Apparently, while British lawyer will touch (if the sentence is confirmed to the Supreme Court) the first lot, the second - more successful - will be acquitted. In the dictionary
Berlusconi, of course.
and he to me: "This miserable mode
tengnon the sorry souls of those who lived
full of infamy and without praise.
0 comments:
Post a Comment